AI use-risk worksheet

Use AI for Structure, Not Authority

AI can help organize options, draft questions, or turn a goal into steps. It can also invent facts, mishandle sensitive information, and sound certain when wrong. Never treat a chatbot as a therapist, doctor, lawyer, crisis service, or final authority.

4

risk functions

NIST organizes AI risk work as govern, map, measure, and manage.

2 sources

high-stakes minimum

Use an official source and the responsible professional or provider before acting on changing facts.

0

necessary secrets

Remove names, account details, private records, and identifying information when they are not needed.

An adult at a threshold at dawn
Original AI-assisted editorial illustration; not a client, clinical encounter, or documented outcome.

A useful distinction

Fluency is not evidence

A model can produce a clean checklist and still invent a credential, law, phone number, citation, or medical explanation. Judge output by traceable sources and real-world checks, not tone.

A Four-Step Decision Process

1

Classify the decision risk

Mark the task low, medium, or high stakes. Brainstorming a meal is not the same as changing medication, reporting abuse, moving money, or making a legal disclosure.

2

Minimize the input

Remove identities, contact details, records, credentials, precise locations, and third-party information unless the task cannot be completed without them. Read the service’s current privacy terms.

3

Demand a verification plan

Ask for assumptions, uncertainties, primary sources, dates, and what professional should verify the result. Then open the sources and check the actual claim.

4

Keep a human decision record

Write what you decided, why, which facts were verified, and who owns the next action. The model should not become the invisible decision-maker.

What This Program Does Not Claim

  • • Never use AI as emergency or crisis care.
  • • Do not upload unnecessary sensitive or third-party data.
  • • Do not rely on generated legal, medical, financial, credential, or contact facts without verification.

Named sources · reviewed August 2, 2026

Verify the Guidance

Private check-in

What do you most want AI to help with?

Nothing is submitted. This page does not invent vote counts or claim that other visitors answered.

Readiness tool

Run an AI output safety check

0 of 4 foundations in place

Choose the statements that are already true for you.

This planning aid is not a safety, legal, medical, or clinical assessment.

Human-owned AI workflow · Reviewed August 2026

Use AI to Structure Work Without Outsourcing Judgment

AI can organize notes, generate options, draft questions, compare stated criteria, and turn a goal into steps. It can also invent facts, expose sensitive information, reproduce bias, and sound confident when wrong. Classify the stakes, minimize the input, demand traceable verification, and keep a named human responsible for every consequential decision.

3

risk levels

Low, medium, and high stakes determine how much verification and professional review are required.

4

risk functions

NIST describes govern, map, measure, and manage as core AI risk functions.

1

named human owner

Every consequential output needs a person accountable for verification and action.

Workflow from task definition through AI draft, verification, human decision, and record

Orientation

The Human-Owned AI Loop

The model assists; a human owns the decision and consequences.

Comparison between confident AI output and traceable verified evidence

Evidence

Fluency Versus Verification

Tone, formatting, and citations are not proof by themselves.

AI-use decision tree based on stakes, privacy, and professional responsibility

Decision

Draft, Verify, Escalate, or Do Not Use

Some tasks should never be delegated to a general chatbot.

Record containing task, data removed, sources checked, decision owner, and next action

Action

The AI Decision Record

Make the invisible use of AI reviewable and accountable.

Browser-only planning tool

Run the human-owned AI workflow

Use the workflow before sending sensitive input or acting on generated facts.

  1. 1Classify the task as low, medium, or high stakes and identify who could be harmed by error.
  2. 2Remove names, records, credentials, account details, precise locations, and third-party information not required.
  3. 3Ask for assumptions, uncertainty, primary sources, dates, scope limits, and the professional or authority that should verify.
  4. 4Open the sources, obtain required human review, record the decision owner, and document the next action.

Match verification effort to consequence

A brainstorming error may waste a few minutes. A fabricated crisis number, provider credential, medication instruction, law, price, contract term, or safety claim can cause serious harm. Increase source quality, independent checks, and professional review as consequence rises.

Do not use a citation merely because the model supplied one. Verify that the page is authentic, current, relevant to the jurisdiction and population, and supportive of the precise statement. If the source cannot be opened, treat the claim as unverified.

Keep third-party information out of the prompt

A person may consent to your use of their name in one context without consenting to upload of their messages, medical details, finances, location, employment records, or family conflict. Data minimization protects people who are not present to negotiate the use.

A durable workflow records what was removed, what model or service was used, which sources were checked, who reviewed the output, what was decided, and when the decision should be revisited. That turns AI from invisible authority into an auditable tool.

Original page video

Use a Human-Owned AI Decision Workflow

A polished answer is still only a draft until the evidence and responsible human are identified.

Synthetic narration and original editorial graphics. No client, therapist, religious group, or documented event is depicted.

Private check-in

Where does your AI workflow need the strongest control?

Nothing is submitted. This page does not invent vote counts or claim that other visitors answered.

Readiness tool

Run the human-owned AI workflow

0 of 4 foundations in place

Choose the statements that are already true for you.

This planning aid is not a safety, legal, medical, or clinical assessment.

Page-specific answers

Questions This Guide Should Answer

Which tasks are appropriate for AI assistance?

Low-stakes drafting, organization, option generation, and question preparation can be useful when outputs are reviewed. Suitability decreases as privacy and consequence increase.

What information should I remove?

Remove identities, private records, account details, credentials, precise locations, health information, and third-party data unless truly required and appropriately protected.

What counts as verifying a citation?

Open the source, confirm it exists, check the date, read the relevant passage, ensure the scope applies, and compare the generated claim with the source’s actual wording.

Who owns an AI-assisted decision?

A named human or accountable organization must own verification, judgment, communication, and consequences. The model cannot accept responsibility.

Questions This Page Should Answer

Can AI replace a therapist or doctor?

No. It can help organize questions, but it cannot perform the accountable assessment, diagnosis, treatment, or emergency response of qualified care.

Is chatbot content private?

Do not assume so. Review the provider’s current terms and settings, minimize data, and avoid unnecessary sensitive or third-party information.

How do I catch hallucinations?

Require primary sources, open them, check dates and exact wording, and verify high-stakes facts with the responsible authority or professional.

Use AI for Structure, Not Authority | Rage 2 Rebuild